Skip Nav

Justice Delayed is Justice Denied | Essay | Expansion & Meaning

Quality papers at the best prices

❶When justice is finally meted out, the effect is naturally a lot diluted. On the 15 th of August, , India finally got its freedom.

Testimonials

Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied Essay Sample
Reader Interactions
Get Full Essay

There are many theories as to the origin of the phrase. The phrase was also used in the famous charter Magna Carta. This popular and relevant saying has been used by various famous personalities to highlight various situations. It was first used by William E. Gladstone was one of the most prominent politicians of Britain. Later, he became the Prime Minister of the country.

He said this quote to highlight the problem of delay in justice. Later, the phrase was also used by Martin Luther King Jr. He used this phrase to highlight the injustice and racism faced by the black community in America by the government and the ruling white community. Such a situation of injustice had been going on for far too long, leading to denial of justice to the one who had suffered.

Thus, he wrote this to highlight the bleak situation if gross violation of human rights of the black people which had been going on for a long time, which in a way, also amounted to denial of justice. On the 15 th of August, , India finally got its freedom. It had been denied justice for far too long. India fought back, peacefully, and gained independence from the British colonialists who had no choice but to give in to the will of millions of Indians who provided a united front. But, the British had left India poor and struggling.

The justice system that India has today is a product of the British rule in India. The judiciary system of India is based on the British model. But the important fact is, this model is quite old and out dated. It is because of this out dated system of courts organisation in India, that there is delay in providing of justice. And when that delay is prolonged for far too long, it amounts to denial of justice itself.

Is such a system healthy for the largest and perhaps the most vibrant democracy in the world? In this accident, the victim has suffered huge loss because of the negligence of the defendant. Due to the accident, the victim is no longer able to provide to her family.

As she was the sole bread earner of the family, the family is left destitute and devastated. The case is pending before the court. Due to delays, backlogs, fees, etc. Only after period of ten years is compensation provided to the victim. Is the compensation of any use now? The victim and his family suffered for 10 years.

The children could not get proper education and the family became destitute. Such a situation is not reversible. Justice, in this case, is denied due to the delay in providing it. In fact, the Indian Judiciary is so infamous for delays that people prefer not to seek court remedy if they can avoid it. Is such a mind- set good?

This would ultimately result in people having no faith in their own Judiciary. Such a situation would be quite dangerous. Then, why are there so many delays in the delivering of judgments? In India, there are about 10, courts. But instead of securing evidences and providing protection the eye witnesses, the police remained apathetic to the case.

As a consequence, all the evidences were willfully destroyed and all the eye witnesses were deliberately allowed to be killed. Besides this, there is a great need of investment in the judicial sector.

And unfortunately the judicial sector is the lowest investment sector. The salaries of the lower court judges are lower than those of the higher and superior courts. Moreover, the deteriorating infrastructures like dilapidated buildings and rickety transportation facilities for prisoners are some of the problems of the judiciary that is struggling to dispense justice to the people with in its meager resources. Finally, the security of the judges is also one of the factors of the failure of judiciary.

Judges in lower and high courts are not provided proper security. They are either intimidated or harassed. For example, the judge who sentenced life imprisonment to Mumtaz Qadri , the murderer of governor Punjab Salman Taseer, was harassed by lawyers who even entered his chamber to kill him, but luckily he escaped unhurt. Eventually, he left the county along with his family owing to death threats. This was the high profile case that came to lime light of media; however, there are many cases which are not brought to light in which judges are hounded out or killed.

If the honorable judges are not safe, then how will they dispense even-handed justice to the public? The consequences of the failed judicial system are gravest which can be seen in the form of lawlessness. The glimpse of the lawlessness can be noticed in the increasing mob violence in our society. Every now and again we hear of lynching of the people on the name of theft or dacoity in villages and cities. Even the alleged people are not dacoit or thief they are lynched on the basis of suspicion.

This directs to the common thinking that is brewing in the minds of the people for many years. People think that since the judiciary has completely failed to provide justice to the people, they have authority to take law into their own hands to punish the criminals. And ill-luck would have it; this type of vigilante thinking is spreading like wildfire. Failure of judiciary is not limited to the mob violence. The effect of it can be descried in increasing incidents of terrorism. So far many terrorists have been acquitted from the courts owing to the absence of either eye witness or evidence, so the attacks on Mehran Base in Karachi, assault on GHQ in Rawalpindi, intrusion on PAF in Chaklala and invasion on Peshawar Airport indicate that terrorists have become emboldened.

They know that even if they are caught, they will be released by the authority concerned. Thus, their attacks are getting lethal day by day. Last but not least, owing to the failure of judiciary, the support for the parallel judicial system is increasing. In this connection, the growning strength of Penchayat system in the villages of Sindh and Punjab and burgeoning power of the Taliban-type judicial system in Fata, in some parts of Khyberpakhtunkhwa and some pockets of Karachi indicate the coming anarchy.

Nevertheless, it is said it is never too late to mend. So, there is a chance that the judicial system can improve itself. Therefore, following recommendations should be borne in the mind to ameliorate the judiciary: One; the new laws must be introduced and existing laws should be amended. Pakistan is grappling with the menace of terrorism, so it requires such laws that are compatible with the prevailing situation.

Regarding the existing laws, these laws should be amended in such a way that they should be in line with the present situation. Two; it is the need of the hour that law enforcement agencies ought to enhance their professionalism in handling of substantial evidence to convict the criminals.

In order to achieve this, they must improve their training. Three; the introduction of the witness-protection program is a must. In the cases of Ajmal Pahari, Kamran madhuri and Wali Baber all the eye witnesses were killed systematically because of the absence of the program.

Had the program been in place, the killers would have been nabbed. Four; the investment in judicial sector must be increased. Finally, the security of the judges should be made compulsory.

To sum up, the judiciary in Pakistan has miserably failed to provide expeditious and cheap justice to the people because of many reasons. Thus, the country has fallen into the bottomless pit of chaos. However, if the aforementioned suggestions are taken seriously, the judiciary will improve. Therefore, judiciary must improve its judicial system.

It is hoped that it will improve in near future. Originally Posted by sarmadalimahar. Sorry sir i did not know this. From now on, i won't do this. Muhammad T S Awan. A good effort, you can improve it by using some quotes or ayat etc. I think there is no need of referring cases of Ajmal Pahari, Kamran Madhuri, Wali Baber etc in outlines, you can put them in the text.

I do not think that salaries of judiciary is a big issue now, specially in comparison to other civilian employees! IV In remedies you may like to mention, professionalism at the level of judges. We have laws for many things but their implementation is one issue and second issue is sound and timely judgment by the judges. If they increase their efficiency than many issues will automatically be resolved Sunday, May 12, Sir, as for as the essay is concerned, justice delayed is justice denied, it is a vast topic.

I still remember the words of a teacher who said to me," Essay is mostly vast. Even word are not enough. Even 10, word are not enough. And even books are not enough. You have to narrow down the topic. And you can do this by the use of the thesis statement. The thesis statement is an argument or a stand that you take.

But I try my level best to improve my writing skills. Search this Thread Advanced Search. BB code is On. All messages made available as part of this discussion group including any bulletin boards and chat rooms and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.

The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message.

We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback.

Primary Sidebar

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

In vogue justice delayed is justice denied is a very smooth saying. But it is not as easy to understand without clarification as to what actu­ally is meant by the delay in justice. In between seeking justice and deliverance of justice there are a lot of pre-requisites and formalities of rules and.

Privacy FAQs

Justice delayed and justice denied means that if justice is not carried out right away timely, then even if it is carried out later it is not really justice because there was a period of time when there was a lack of justice. In vogue justice delayed justice denied is a very smooth saying.

About Our Ads

Justice delayed is justice denied is a maxim which means that even if remedy against an illegal injury caused is available but not executed in due time, such a situation is comparable to . Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied Essay Sample. There are countless and innumerable arrears in High courts and Supreme Court, and one crore and more in lower courts pending disposal.

Cookie Info

Free words essay on JUSTICE DELAYED, JUSTICE DENIED? for school and college students. On 16th December , a young physiotherapy student in New Delhi, India, alighted on a bus bound to her destination. Sometime later. Justice delayed and justice denied means that if justice is not carried out right away timely, then even if it is carried out later it is not really justice because there was a period of time when there was a lack of justice.